REHMAT ALI versus THE STATE
Section 120 B / 302/34/360 A Definition of Evidence FIR has not named any of the accused nor has the details of any of the accused been given and it is stated that the victim was killed by some unknown persons only. The complainant, his daughter (not presented) and the deceased were mentioned in the FIR and neither the accused nor any of the prosecution witnesses have been mentioned in the case. In which two witnesses first appeared before the police with a reasonable delay of three months, the natural explanation for the delay was the prosecution witnesses elsewhere. Located 10/12 miles from the location of the incident, the location of the incident was a very busy place in Lari Ada and there were several shops near it, but none of them mentioned shopkeepers in the FIR. That the conduct of one of the prosecution witnesses was so unnatural that it seemed like he was a witness and his presence on the spot was surprisingly doubtful that he could not be used against the accused. The statement of eyewitnesses who appeared before the investigating officer three months after the incident cannot be relied upon. There is no doubt that A young boy was killed, but the innocent must be sent to execution unless prosecutors can prove his case, without doubt. The defendant's alleged extra-judicial confession was not true because it was not made voluntarily and it was Ma, witnesses for the alleged extra-judicial confession three months later had already modified their statements. The trial court extra-judicially admitted the offense
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Ugoki lawyer