MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus THE STATE
Evidence of delay in the Pakistan Penal Code Section 223 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The evidence on record did not show that the accused was either a lockup passenger or that the lockup was opened on his instruction and that he had escaped. Was a prisoner. Without a doubt, he was on duty, but his lockup was not under his direct supervision, or the prisoner escaping from the command was taken out of the lockup on the direction of Shab Moharr in the presence of the duty officer and the prosecution Had failed to prove that it was exclusively the negligence of the accused or extended any facility in connection with the delay in the escape to 145 days. The accused was unlawful and also because the Supreme Court had generally apologized for the delay in criminal cases. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Islamabad lawyer
