GHULAM ALI versus MAKHDOOM RAFIQUE-UZ-ZAMAN
Sections 2, 3 and 14 (1) (c) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition challenged the ability of the respondent to contest the election of a candidate for the District Council on the basis that He and his wife were registered as voters on the Cantonment Area voter list, while they were permanent residents of another area, the returning officer accepted the nomination papers, which was then submitted by the applicant to the District Returning Officer. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected in the appeal before the Deputy Election Commissioner. The endorsement excluded its name from the cantonment area's electoral list and the same was listed in the electoral roll of another area, dated 7 2001 7 2001, which was not challenged by the applicant through a notification by the Chief Election Commissioner. It was clarified on the date 20, 2001, that the local area for the purpose of the District Council elections shall be the entire district under section 3 of the Ordinance including the determination of the eligibility and eligibility of the candidates for the District Council elections according to the section of the Ordinance Petition. 140) (c), which did not challenge the wiring of the notification, but only referred to the Returning Officer and Only the orders passed by the District Returning Officer were challenged. Not facing interference with any kind of illegal interference or interference with instability, the High Court's constitutional application was dismissed under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Kunri lawyer