Find a Lawyer

AHMAD YAR versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) Appreciating Evidence According to the prosecution, the accused's intention was to kidnap the victim and not kill him, and no one injured any prisoner in the house, which could have obstructed their way. Is. The prosecution's story was unnatural and was neglected by chance to recover the vacancy, the firearm expert's report and medical evidence were not located because the prosecution had already acquitted the nine accused by the trial court. On the same evidence the Chemical Examiner's report on the vaginal pressure of the deceased, which has been stained with semen, was suppressed by the prosecution in its statement under Section 342, CRPC. In which a prosecution was convicted. The case was full of doubts and the suspects were acquitted on the benefit of the doubt list of supreme court advocates from Toru lawyer