Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HADI versus THE STATE

Validating the evidence of sections 8 and 17 of the Drug Control Substance Act 1997, the production of any illicit drug, anything related to or related to the production, manufacture, manufacture, etc. of the drug Was not exported from the area. Import, transport or manufacture imported, transported or manufactured drug paraphernalia to provide evidence that the accused committed, or attempted to commit, a crime punishable under the Counter-Narcotics Act. Pregnancy or prepared or financed. The 1997 prosecution also did not successfully release the initial burden, proving that the defendant had obstructed or hindered any officer from performing his duties under the aforesaid act, 8 and 17, and no evidence was found of it. Section 29 of the aforesaid Act was introduced by the prosecution so that the accused could be charged with criminal liability to prove his innocence, therefore, only because of this Because the defendant did not move that such a case could be extracted from the facts and circumstances, the prosecution's evidence had satisfactorily explained. His presence in the area and the evidence leading up to it were convincing and the suspect was likely acquitted. lawer from fb area from Ghari Dupatta lawyer