Find a Lawyer

GHULAM AMIR versus IRSHAD AHMAD

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Sections 96 and 100 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5, 14 and Article 156 West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance (II of 1962), Section 18 [whereby the Punjab Civil Courts Ordinance (Amendment) Act ( V) [1986]] During the approval of the appeal, the extension of the appeal limit to the District Judge's optional jurisdiction was challenged by the District Judge, who, due to lack of legal jurisdiction, appealed to the Appellants on the appropriate forum. Returned the memorandum to the High Court. The review filed by the appellant sought remand for the hearing of the appeal on the confirmation of the case, which included a limitation question. The Additional District Judge dismissed the appeal because of limitations and the absence of jurisdiction over the opposition. The limit for filing an appeal before the High Court was 90 days, which can be filed by 31 198 1986. Appellants had one month to refer to the High Court on 14 6 1986, when section 18 of the C The Courts Ordinance was amended in 1986, whereby the District Judge's jurisdiction for hearing appeals was increased from 50,000 to 2 million; the District Judge's jurisdiction for the return of the appeal was 28 in 1988. Was passed, which was later ordered. On the one hand the review of the High Court will consider the question of limitation in such circumstances, the deprivation of importance and the appeal before the District Judge, which the High Court accepted on the other hand, and set aside the unwanted decision and order and Received additional remand of this case. The district judge for a merit decision pakistani advocates More kunda lawyer