Find a Lawyer

M. IFT1KHAR MIAN, THE CHIEF MANAGER, UNION BANK LIMITED versus CHAIRMAN BANKING TRIBUNAL, FAISALABAD

Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 199 Constitutional Petition contempt of court After the banking tribunal passed the order against the plaintiff, on its request the contempt court proceedings against the plaintiff bank began. A confidential report was obtained from another bank about. The banking tribunal regarding the defendant's legal status had issued a malicious notice to the plaintiff's banking tribunal without following the request, and issued a contempt of court notice to the applicant in complete negligence of the law on the subject, while uncovering its contents. There has been no contempt of court case for reading. The banking tribunal had acted beyond its jurisdiction and had violated the provisions of the law. If there was any harm to the defendants or its directors / guarantors, it was appropriate remedy to sue and humiliate the defendant. Not to commence proceedings of the High Court, while accepting the constitutional request, the notice and proceedings initiated by the banking tribunal were illegal and without any legal authority. immigration advocates email from Minchanabad lawyer