MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus CHAIRMAN SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Article 38 (7) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Transfer of a Complaint to a Labor Court on the grounds that it relinquished its trust with the Labor Court, Where his complaint was pending the Labor Appellate Tribunal after dismissing the Labor Court Presiding Officer's comment. The applicants said that the transfer order was approved without notice and so they have been seriously condemned. Or the action of the Labor Court in its jurisdiction may pass the case either on its own motion or at the request of a party without notice to the opposing party as Section 38 (7) of the Ordinance provides for such notice. Did not In his remarks the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court requested the tribunal to avoid any embarrassment to another court, since the case was in accordance with the basic principles of the case was absolutely correct because litigation and court The bitterness between Germany and Germany was not provided for justice, the purpose of the notice was to enable the opposition to present their point of view. Court Petitioners have failed to show that any of their rights have been adversely affected or that they have been discriminated against as a result of the transfer of information without notice, therefore, the exercise of extraordinary powers of the High Court The former terms were not satisfied in the present case. The High Court declared the constitutional petition untenable and unenforceable.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Dinga lawyer