Find a Lawyer

SAADI CEMENT LTD. versus FAZAL-E-QADIR

Claims 15 and 17 of the Salary Payment Act 1936 Pakistan (1973), Article 199, Alternative treatment for retaining unpaid claim was claimed in favor of the employee against which Section 17 of the Employer Payment Act, 1936 Did not receive the remedy of the appeal under. According to the constitutional request, the law cannot be allowed to be stopped by a constitutional application through a tiled constitutional petition and it will not be correct to assume that the machinery behind the constitutional jurisdiction to carry out the machinery provided under the Constitution Work with the intent of The Wages of Payment Act, 1936, was to ensure that the money included under the order under the provisions of section 15 of the Wages Act, 1936, should be deposited in the confiscated forum on this matter, before such order The appeal against the petition was granted, the High Court denied. Employs to stop the supply of law because the employer did not take advantage of the proper and effective treatment petite solicitors from Domeli lawyer