Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD EHTESHAM versus SAJID LATEEF SETHI

Legislative Decree Order 1984 Arts 95 and 117 Special Relief Act (in 1877), Sections 8 and 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Articles 44 and 53 of the Declaration of General Attorney's powers and The burden of claiming evidence for the appellants was that the plot of attorney was allegedly executed in favor of the defendant in the dispute by his late father, on the basis of which the defendant sold the plot to the other respondents. What was and is fake and fake and was sold on the basis of it. Said the power of attorney was illegal and responsible for setting aside the appellant and by providing sufficient documentary evidence on the record, he said that the attorney stated that his late father was the defendant. Had never acted in favor of. Sell the plot in the dispute and he said that the Power of Attorney was obtained by the respondents where the document was rejected by its executor or by a single claim. Under this, the party claiming as a fake document will have to claim under the document that the document was a genuine ounce in such a case to prove to the respondents that the documents were processed in their favor and that The fact that he failed to dispel the notion of truth was the trial court's rejection of the attached document, in which case, it was not justified to dismiss the case that the appellant failed to prove the attorney general's power of attorney. And that was a hoax. jobs for fresh advocates from Ranipur lawyer