Find a Lawyer

JEHANGIR RUSTAM KAKALIA versus MESSRS HASHWANI SALES & SERVICES (PVT.) LIMITED

Section 15 (2) (vi) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) requires the landlord to reconstruct the premises of rent-controlled areas through controversial fact courts for reconstruction. The building project was approved by the rent controller. At the same time, the High Court, after careful consideration of the evidence contained by both parties, recorded the facts as well as the results, justifying where the rent was satisfied by the material available on the record. And the truth was discovered through the satisfactory evidence recorded by him. When for the first time agreeing with the court's view, it did not appear that there was evidence of reading and not reading the wrong news, the decision passed by the High Court was a violation of the law's structure or rule of law in this case. There was no victim. Eliminate the conclusions drawn by both courts that the landlord's requirement to meet the premises was reasonable, since no element of property duties or dishonest purposes could be excluded from the evidence which led to the Supreme Court's intervention. Refusing to do so, these decisions were rejected by the Court of Appeal's leave. list of advocates from Mardan lawyer