Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SIMPLEX RUBBER MANUFACTURERS (PVT.) LTD. versus SIMPLEX RUBBER MANUFACTURERS EMPLOYEES UNION


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Articles 22A (9) (B) and 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O11A Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Non-Complaint Request Is fair. Establishment permission was sought by the employer for the transfer of labor practice through a single bench of the National Industrial Relations Commission and the employees were terminated without waiting for permission and a petition was received under section 25A of the notice industrial. Relations Ordinance, 1969, West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance was filed before the Labor Court during the proceedings under section O11A of 1968, before the employer relinquished the National Industrial Relations Commission's single bench. Filed a request for Labor Court cases allow employer to close E-Establishment and Employee Complaint Requests were dismissed, Full Bench of the National Industrial Relations Commission allowed the employees to appeal and the National Industrial Relations Commission An order of dismissal was set aside by a single bench of K, which the employer argued that the National Industrial Relations Commission was unable to decide the matter as there was no question of unfair labor practice, anywhere in the petition. It was not alleged that the employer and employees were unfair when the request was pending There was also no question of labor practice. Before the Labor Court, which had the jurisdiction to deal with them, a single bench of the National Industrial Relations Commission issued an order seeking a record from the Labor Court and their immediate settlement was illegal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.