MUHAMMAD MAL KHAN versus ALLAH YAR KHAN
Failure to present testimony of the testimony of Article 139 (10 of 1984), Article 129 (g) of the pre-martyrdom statement, in the presence of which Toliba Mutawit was made a pre-emperor, even though the person was named But the person was not presented as a witness when the trial court decided before the trial court on the solitary confinement statement of the premier relating to the student being made to the Appellate Court. Was sentenced because he did not reject the case. The appellate court's endorsement was upheld by the High Court in the jurisdiction's legal process, which in the absence of any explanation by the prosecution conceded that the witness would be excused from examining his testimony. Why withheld because the testimony was presented, the Supreme Court refused to interfere in concluding with the appellate court and Haig.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Musafir Khana lawyer
