LIAQUAT ALI versus THE STATE
The absence of the accused's signature on his statement under section 342 and 364 (2) section 342, CRPC, and the absence of a certificate under the CRPC under the trial judge's signature is not an IPSO fact. Unlawful in the nature of a failure to uproot the entire proceeding or to be unenforceable in the legal proceedings from the recording phase of the trial, the trial court must seek remand, on the contrary, only such error Is an irregularity. And if the case is capable of showing the presence or absence of its signature on its statement under Section 2, 2, CRPC, send the trial to the trial court from the recording phase of the accused's statement. Will be given In his own writings, the trial judge found that he had suffered some kind of prejudice which resulted in injustice where there was no discrimination against the accused and no misunderstanding of justice. ty is treatable and not fatal to punishment or punishment
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Chaghi lawyer
