Find a Lawyer

AZIZUL HAQ versus THE STATE

68 (1) and (2) of the Sindh Children Act 1955 (XLV of 1860), 5 364 the FIR was lodged without any evidence and no allegation of enmity was made between the accused and the school teacher. had gone. The accused kidnapped girl was recovered on identification of the accused. The prosecutor, beyond any doubt, proved the accused's guilt by claiming that he was entitled to acquit the accused because he was 18 at the time of trial. He had no power punishment. The 14-year-old, who was convicted, however, was unlawful because, according to the provisions of section 68 (1) of the Sindh Children Act 1955, no juvenile offender could be sentenced to life imprisonment or life imprisonment. ? The result was set aside and the matter was referred to the provincial government for orders under section 68 (2) of the Sindh Children's Act, 1955, during which the accused was instructed to remain in safe custody. SCMR 1551 of 1993 reported in light of Supreme Court verdict, up to the jury of juvenile offenders, until a reference decision by the provincial government best advocate from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer