Find a Lawyer

ABDUL ALI versus HAJI BISMILLAH

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) reviewing the objection to the evidence of jurisdiction at the appellate stage, even if the High Court had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal, the accused should raise such objection at a later stage. Could not be allowed. Stoppel's rule, which works against him because of his identity or silence, and especially when the trial court and the High Court lack jurisdiction in this case, all proceedings have been canceled due to a defect in the charge. An attempt was made to declare. The accused did not behave in a discriminatory manner but did not benefit, did not succeed, which was merely a matter of skill and did not advance the outcome of justice. The High Court presented legal evidence which was on record but did not show it. Could and should be declared admissible because of the negligence of the trial court and, such exercise by the High Court to advance the cause of justice was not open to any exception. y In recording the statements of witnesses under Section 161, the CCP was due to the negligence / error of the police officers who failed to record their statements despite their presence, effectively accusing the victim of firing. The charge against the accused was proved. Despite the medical witnesses' persistent statements of all witnesses who knew of the case against him for more than three years, the accused's appeal was dismissed in the circumstances. best advocate from Machi Goth lawyer