Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS versus PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.III

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 51 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art, 199 Constitution Petition The jurisdiction and closed transaction was the principle of applicable applicant. The Labor Appellate Tribunal was again restored with the benefit of a constitutional petition filed against such order of concession; the employer applied for the applicant with a labor appellate tribunal petition under section 12 (2). An application for execution was approved before the Labor Court for execution. The CPC alleged by the employer that the order of back benefits was obtained through misrepresentation and fraud. The Labor Court granted the request and dismissed the request for execution when the order of recovery from the payback. If the final position had been obtained, the implementing court could not travel beyond the judgment. Or an attempt to execute the judgment once the order has been finalized with back-up benefits, such an order was a past and closed transaction and the execution of any award, order, decision or decision by the court. It can be revisited or not reopened, just diversified, modified, reversed. The jurisdiction of the appellate or the amended by this classification provided under the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, nor the powers exercised by the Labor Court under section 51 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 There were options and they couldn't. Application or review jurisdiction Pakistan, top advocate family court from Pindi gheb lawyer