SYED KALB-E-ABBAS versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LAHORE
Articles 302/2011 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Articles 204 and 439, the execution of the proceedings is bound to pass the order of a speech because the execution of the proceedings to face trial in a murder case may cause injury and torture to the accused. In this case, the trial court had formed itself on the basis of material presented on this matter. The allegations, first of all, constitute a crime and present sufficient grounds for action against the accused; the trial court, based solely on the inquiry report submitted by the magistrate, did not consider the evidence on record. Approved the macro order in style. There is certainly a case for allegations that his reputation and serviceman will suffer irreparable harm and injury that the trial court could not hear, thus relying solely on the inquiry report. Failed to exercise jurisdiction, the impeachment order was declared invalid and after considering it, the trial court was ordered to pass a new order. There was ample evidence on record that the accused should be summoned to face the rigors of a criminal trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Mamu kunjan lawyer