Find a Lawyer

DR. IFTIKHAR AHMAD ZAHID versus MRS. NEELOFAR AKHTAR

Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 19081, Section 148) For the specific performance of the contract of sale, the suit was decided in favor of an extension vendor within the time allowed by the trial court suit to allow the seller to consider the balance. If the payment is due, the vendor requested an extension of time from the trial court which was rejected because the trial court was not occupied with the validity where a party needed to do something under an injunction And the time limit was set for doing so, the decision that the court approved had no jurisdiction. Extending the time but was subject to the merits that where the decree or order which was set at that time was not intended to be final and the court still retained control of the proceedings, the court made section 148, CPC To extend the period where the period was specified by order. Unless the nature of the preliminary injunction and the court still kept the proceedings hollow, the provisions of section 148, CPC were not applicable. The competent decree, in the present case, was self-imposed and the trial. The court had no jurisdiction to extend the time, and the request for extension of time was rightly dismissed. The High Court refused to interfere with the trial court's order. property advocate from Gari Habibullah lawyer