Find a Lawyer

MST. ALLAH WASAI versus MST. RASHIDAN

West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 Section 45 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 120 Special Relief Act (I of 1877) Section 8 Suit for possession of immovable property, final discovery by factual courts, Defendants The challenge to Ali's motion in advance was to uphold the decree of consent in the earlier trial and allow for change in his favor. Plaintiffs allege that the ruling was fraudulent, fraudulent and forged documents because no action was taken to properly identify the person present in court and the case was decided on this date. The date of the hearing was not 7 3 1969 in the preceding trial, but in the same case the case was registered on the petitioner's request on 15 1 1969, before the plaintiff's predecessor had obtained the case for his consent. There was a time when he was not represented by a lawyer and in fact he was convicted before the last lawsuit was filed. And thus he could not appear in court or admit any decision. The trial court ruled in favor of the defendants and the judgment and order were upheld by the appellant court's defendants that the present trial was timely. Was banned where the controversial variable was adopted on 29 3 1969 and the case was tiled. On 2 2 1980, the case was within range and was found to be correct so the courts below the High Court refused to interfere with the factual inquiries by the following courts. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sita Road lawyer