KHADIM HUSSAIN versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, PEOPLE\'S COLONY
Section 17/22 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The complainant for retaining the constitutional petition alleged in his FIR that the applicant and the defendant had received the money to send it abroad and the applicant had filed F. The complainant was paid under IA pressure. The authority and the applicant were quite innocent and had nothing to do with the transaction between the complainant and the defendant, and the matter was filed before the Anti-Corruption Court against the petitioner petitioner alleging that the police were harassing him. And pray that the authorities were instructed not to harass him in any way, the legitimate issue included controversial question and the High Court had no jurisdiction to resolve such question in the constitutional jurisdiction. The applicant failed to present the document that he and his respondent were fraudulent Was not a party. It was arbitrary to impose constitutional jurisdiction with the complainant in the role and since the applicant and the defendant cheated innocent people like the complainant, the arbitrator could not be exercised in favor of the applicant as The person should appear in court for justice, he was cleared by a constitutional application
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
