SAWAR GUL versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 law refuses to declare the testimony (10 of 1984), evidence 46 after the death of two accused who survived the incident, the firearm in his back only There was an injury. The assailant opened fire on him while the victim was sitting behind the identity of the assailant two or three feet high, in circumstances certainly open to suspicion that the eyewitnesses claimed to be present. The witness's testimony must have satisfied the court's mind through some conclusive evidence about the physical condition or its presence, but there was no co-operation to confirm its presence. Syed Aini Shahid also twisted the story because the FIR has given the assertion that if the motive was irrational, then the crime of the crime would be equally encouraging to the complainant. The accused was lied to under circumstances where he falsely accused or accused of extortion.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Jhudo lawyer