Find a Lawyer

MIAN FAZAL AHMAD versus ABDUL AZIZ

According to Section I & ?? Pre-Impression, the right to spray preat emption is based on the fact that he committed a suicide attack on his vendor while the seller claimed to be a co-owner of the State / Khata pre-emptor so that he had the highest rights. The pedigree table prepared proved that while the seller prepared it. Jamabandi verdict of the case after verifying his ownership in the State / Khata Trial Court, but the appellate court dismissed the opinion of the former emperor that the verification of the Jamabandi presented by Wandi changed the sale of matters in this case. Which is valid where the controversial sale was applied on 29 10 4 1974, could not even be included in the Jamabandi of the preceding years Ex-Importer, based on the evidence available on the record, appreciated the evidence by the appellant. The court failed to admire the unthinkable and the High Court intervened in the appellate court's decision and order Refused to addiction law firms from Khewra lawyer