Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MST. SAIMA ASHRAF versus S.H.O.


Article 199 of the Zena (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), repealing Section 11 of the FLR Petitioner, requested that the FIR be annulled that it was a suicidal court and that it did so on its own free will. And had agreed to the marriage contract with consent and did not commit any kind. As a proof of this petition, the petitioner had also attached his application to the marriage contract. The High Court could not accept the petitioner's inquiry officer's request to quash the FIR, which the High Court directed the Investigation Officer to record. If the applicant and his witnesses are presented before them and the documentary evidence is obtained and the inquiry ends after the two parties join, the application is harassed without any party being called in a particular party. The age-old dispute can also be settled after the necessary acquisition. Medical evidence if needed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.