MST. SAIMA ASHRAF versus S.H.O.
Article 199 of the Zena (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), repealing Section 11 of the FLR Petitioner, requested that the FIR be annulled that it was a suicidal court and that it did so on its own free will. And had agreed to the marriage contract with consent and did not commit any kind. As a proof of this petition, the petitioner had also attached his application to the marriage contract. The High Court could not accept the petitioner's inquiry officer's request to quash the FIR, which the High Court directed the Investigation Officer to record. If the applicant and his witnesses are presented before them and the documentary evidence is obtained and the inquiry ends after the two parties join, the application is harassed without any party being called in a particular party. The age-old dispute can also be settled after the necessary acquisition. Medical evidence if needed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Rawalpindi lawyer
