MST. ANWAR BIBI versus ABDUL HAMEED
Civil Procedure 1908 Section 115 Revision Procedure The current findings of fact by the courts below the interference by the High Court in the exercise of the jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Act, CPC Scope, as the application of the statute which is legal and factual The petition was not legally settled. The record was also misrepresented by the courts by the High Court, which justified the intervention in detecting what was on record as an illegal High Court rightly interfering with its findings. In order to see that full justice was done with this party, which was suffered under the jurisdiction of the two courts below the High Court in the amended jurisdiction, but in the present case both the courts were unlawful. Worked as a jurisdiction and misused the record on evidence Therefore, the intervention was justified by the High Court and the Supreme Court legally refused to interfere with the decision by the High Court, in which case the jurisdiction under section 115, under the CPC
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Mubarik Pur lawyer