Find a Lawyer

AZIZ-UR-REHMAN versus THE STATE

Article 2/2 / un34 Law of the Martyrs (evidence of evidence 10) Art 121 Testimony of the evidence The incident was illuminated on the day and the matter was immediately carried by the police with the names, weapons and the accused. Was reported. The incident was fully described in the immediately-filed FIR Complainant, who was the real brother of the deceased, although not the resident of the scene, but at the time of the incident in his deceased brother's house Presence was fully explained. The witness had no connection with the complaining party, nor was there any enmity towards the accused, nor was there any reason to falsely implicate the accused doctor who performed the autopsy. Two bullets and a sharp weapon and said that the injured were reported to the victim in front of the police and C before the trial court. The defendant and the prosecution's witness version of the prosecution did not submit their statement under Section 342, CR PC, when a particular plea was made by an accused and he moved his case to one of the exceptions under section 302 (c). Wanted to bring, the PPC will then disclose to the accused the accused to prove his plea which is required under Article 121 of the evidence of the law, refusing to recover the accused at the 1984 trial, the accused The matter will not be forwarded as the recoveries are serious pieces of evidence and if not otherwise the case will be completed through an ocular account and medical evidence. I was on the ends of the bazyaftun was able to prove the case against the accused and the prosecution examined long prosecution witnesses, the defense of pakistani advocates Mir Ali lawyer