Find a Lawyer

PRESENT: MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI, CHAIRMAN, SHARIQ MAHMOOD, versus PRESENT: MUHAMMAD MUJEEBULLAH SIDDIQUI, CHAIRMAN, SHARIQ MAHMOOD,

Section 16 (3) of the Wealth Tax Act 1963, adding value to the net wealth of the property inherited under the lawsuit for distribution and occupation of the property, Assisi showed only his share of the property and there was no value associated with these properties. He belongs to the late father and is not being reviewed. Assisi's position in the possession of the same appraisal officer was dropped and the value added to the property being in joint possession of the property was removed by the appellate authority with the observation that the property was released. Live. In the name of the reviewer's father and in the possession / occupation of his younger brother the legitimate parties were co-heirs and co-owners of the joint suit properties and were still in joint possession as joint owners and joint heirs, even legal As a matter of fact, soon after the death of the donkey's father, the donkeys became heirs to the inherited property, which was considered part of the Shariah law and also maintained its constructive possession. The deduction of the value of this disputed property by the First Appellate Authority was suspended because it became joint owner of the legacy of the prospective father from the value written for the purpose of the jurisdiction of the court reviewing officer. The property can be assessed in such a way that the reviewer's proprietary portion of the property left by his father was rightly included, after which the search for the First Appellate Authority was vacated and by the Assessing Officer. The treatment given was restored. By Tribunal advocate for immigration from Muridkay lawyer