Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF SINDH versus SOHAIL AKHTAR

Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The new petition for land grabbing was won by the government without payment to seven landlords without reservation but withheld. In respect of the defendants, the trial court ruled that the land compensation case obtained by the government was upheld and the judgment passed by the trial court was upheld by the competence of the High Court. The Supreme Court observed that it was at the height of the government's contradictory position, which willingly and without justification paid the amount of compensation and withheld the reference of the respondents without justification. The ban was banned when no such request had been raised before, but the government could not be expected to raise such unreasonable and hypertensive requests before. After the Supreme Court has failed to meet its legal and legal obligations, the citizens have a duty once their land has been acquired for public purpose / the government has the responsibility to pay the landowner reasonable compensation. The Supreme Court refused to interfere in the High Court's decision to ensure payment of the property and not seek refuge in technical objections. The appeal was denied on leave us immigration advocates from Doaaba lawyer