Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus THE STATE

National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 9 Proof of allegations of corruption and allegations of corruption was the food supervisor in the provincial food department from 1982 to 1997, and neither cited corruption nor corruption practices. The accused was brought on record, there was no evidence to show that the accused did anything illegal during the course of his duties, violated any rules, violated any confiscation, The individual has gone out of his way to make a profit. The prosecution's witnesses admitted in cross-examination that the accused had a good reputation and was not staying ahead of them, three persons who hated the accused had submitted a petition against the accused, which was investigated by the department and Their request was rejected. Food Inquiry Officer records indicate that the accused was never involved in the \ corrupt and corrupt practices. Living a simple life and having a good reputation, the investigating officer of the National Accountability Bureau was unable to even utter a word about the alleged corruption or corruption, the trial court was declared completely baseless. The sentence and the sentence were set aside. ask a advocate free from Qambar Shahdatkot lawyer