Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Sections 302 and 307 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898) of Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), an appeal against the discharged doctor who conducted the post-mortem of the deceased and examined the witness of the injured prosecution only prospects. And wasn't sure about it. The timing of the doctor's statement was not strictly accurate at the time of Mortas' view, or the final indications regarding the cause of death were not adequately available in the doctor's statement, and the findings of the trial court in this regard were abrupt. And a non-scientific but non-fictional FIR was registered to immediately designate the accused. The incident was located in the thick of the village population, an eyewitness was injured, the trial, the court had to weigh all these facts to find the cause, the common purpose and the logic. , But he made a jumble of facts and came to the conclusion that was speculative and logical. The trial court also ignored the injured witness, who could have sustained injuries even if the injured witness had shown contempt of the accused due to the land litigation, but the person injured was a worse enemy. And it did not appeal to the intellect to substitute for the accused. Ocular evidence had established the case against the accused and there was no defensive evidence in the file. On the contrary, the trial court declared the decision to be in favor of the accused separately. Sentenced under Section 2302, PPC and sentenced to death because he was not eligible for any exemption even though he was acquitted several years ago and is still unaware. pakistani advocates Haroonabad lawyer