Find a Lawyer

ANEES-UR-REHMAN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 2 (b) / 34 34 Testimonies of Evidence Eyewitnesses tried to improve the version according to the complainant's stance in their supplementary statement rather than speaking the truth, and it appears that The complainant of the case has also made major reforms in his supplementary statement regarding the attackers, their role and the place where the incident took place, but shops and tea at the site of the incident. Despite the presence of the stalls, no person was cited or their name presented in this case the prosecution's witness denied. Or because the independent independent corroborative evidence of the defendant who was acquitted was necessary to establish the basis of the conviction of the accused, which was not available. The motive was not established in the FIR, it could not be used. The controversial piece Complainant denied and made the FIR version After making significant and significant improvements to it, the FIR lost its sanctity, which appears to have been recorded after the investigation had already begun. Is. Medical evidence did not advance the prosecution's case No recovery was taken from the accused. Investigation in this case was unquestionably beneficial. The suspicion was extended to the suspects and accordingly they were acquitted. top civil advocates from Sehar Baqlas lawyer