ALLAH DITTA versus H AQ NAWAZ
The presence of the customary practice of Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 7 disturbance had to be proved by the evidence in the area where the customary danger was prevailing, the appellant / witnesses did not make any statement in this regard. No concrete evidence was ever brought on record to show that the area before the enactment of the Punjab Pre-Empty Act, 1913, was within the boundaries of the Municipal Committee, Multan, the appellate court's decision and the decree of rejecting the appellant's case. Were by definition. And the facts on record in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Kallat lawyer
