Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus THE STATE

Complainant / Affidavit of Defamation of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 Evidence 1979 did not support the prosecution's case because it stated that she had been tutored by someone and that the person had been threatened. If she did not do so, then according to the tutored version, her children would be killed. Lady admitted that the accused in the court did not have intercourse with her and she was innocent of any other witness to the incident. Was not present and even the investigating officer admitted that upon cross-examination that the incident was suspicious according to his investigation, the doctor complained Examining the complainant said that no trace of any kind was found on the complainant's body nor was there any sign of torture at his private parts. The complainant was a married woman in the Chemical Examiner's arid report that the vagina bushes were stained with semen, which was not evidence of adultery when she was accompanied by the accused before her husband's medical examination. Could have had intercourse, medical examination report, in the absence of any other evidence, would not prove guilt; in the circumstances, there was no evidence. The trial court set aside the accused and they were acquitted of the charges leveled against them. top civil advocates from New Saeedabad lawyer