BEFORE MUHAMMAD SHARIF CHAUDHRY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND RASHEED AHMED SHEIKH, JUDICIAL MEMBER versus BEFORE MUHAMMAD SHARIF CHAUDHRY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND RASHEED AHMED SHEIKH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Session 66A (IA), 62 and 135 powers to inspect the Additional Commissioner to modify the order of the Deputy Commissioner, whether he was the importer and supplier of the asset or he was the indenter and It received a commission, the appellate authority ruled, and the appraisal officer, following the appellate authority's directive, canceled the appraisal by inspecting the appraisal commissioner's appraisal, as the matter was subject to appeal. And the appellate authority has already decided on the said issue, so the proceedings under section Yannis, 66A of 1979 will not lie on the basis of this issue as Section 62 / Section 61A (Section 1A) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, as per the directions of the appellate authority on section 62 / Income Tax Ordinance, 135 of 1979 False and not prejudicial to review the interest of the Revenue Order passed by the Additional Commissioner, inspected under Section 66A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, that the appellate tribunal dismissed these reviews as non. Legal and without jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
