Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus SHAH NAWAZ

Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 8 and 42 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Sections 122 and 123 of the Land Reform Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115), para 25 suit for possession and declaration gift, defendant's trial justified The owner of the sui property comprising thi agricultural land and the home gave the gift in favor of the donor's daughter and grandson and it is claimed that the property was granted to them, the defendants acknowledged that the suit property donor But denied the facts of the gift, claiming that the gift was a violation of MLR 115 and claimed that the house had been in their possession for more than 12 years. Is in negative possession. The defendants also claimed that the gift was bad because the suit land was an undisclosed part. The legitimate gift was a registered document that the defendants failed to establish their claim of negative possession over the suithouse, although that was a controversial part, but at the relevant time. The suit contained in MLR 115 was prohibited and the gift would not be invalid because the plaintiff / defendant could have obtained possession by filing a lawsuit for division as the donor not only took the matter into his possession. I delivered. Gift to the plaintiff / defendants, but she was living with them in the house, the possession of the plaintiff / defendant in the case filed, the court correctly ruled the case and there was no case of interference in the decision. Did not come By Appellate Court within the jurisdiction of the High Court us immigration advocates from Mamu kunjan lawyer