Find a Lawyer

ENGINEER NARAINDAS versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 (1) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 25 and 212 (3) delay the service tribunal's contract before the unqualified forum to terminate effective applicants. The failed order of the challenged writ petitions offered services to the High Court, and subsequently applications were filed before the Supreme Court, which was observed and resolved - v. To resolve the complaint. , They may refer to the Service Tribunal, which will consider the issue of limitation sympathetically. The Service Tribunal dismissed the appeals. The petitioner has been barred from filing that the observations made in the case of Saleem Mustafa Sheikh and others (PLD 2001 SC 176) did not apply to the appeals. To keep the issue of boundaries wide open. Appeals were barred by the service tribunal petitioners for 129 days and their case was equivalent to Saleem Mustafa Sheikh's case, in which the appeal before the service tribunal was given a 105-day ban. The Tribunal was appointed a Reasonable Service Tribunal; after the rule of consistency, the applicant should be consoled with the delay in the Tribunal's appeals so as not to be comforted. Despite this, it has been delayed that he has been protesting the matter since the end of his removal to the High Court and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court turned the petitions into appeals and allowed them to set aside the service tribunal's decisions. criminal advocate from Fizagat lawyer