Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SHERANI BROTHERS versus MST. SARWAT AKHTAR

Sections 17 and 24 of the Cantonment Rent Restraint Act 1963 were denied by the landlord petitioner's denial of the landlord and tenant relationship on the ground that he was acting as his principal's counsel. Was taking care of the premises, which, after a similar purchase from the land, leased it to his brother, through a contract with a screamer, after the hiring controller accepted it as a landlord, renting it out. The appellant was granted as a subpoena as the plaintiff and the appellant, in the pending case between the parties, The Court restrained the dismissal of the appellant as the application for leave of the houses was permissible under the law, as there was a limited court controlling the rent of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963. The decision of the civil court for the action to be rendered will not go to the landlord. The jurisdiction had no jurisdiction to settle the matter, even though Land Maldy agreed to the principal premises filed by the appellant suit for the specific performance of the sale agreement against OXVII. , 3, was dismissed under CPC, whose decision was no longer challenged in the appeal, dismissing the request for a dismissal of such case. The High Court dismissed the appeal on the basis of the finding recorded by the appellant that it was the principal owner / landlord on the basis of reasonable, reasonable and record evidence. advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer