The entire process of alibi taken by the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was considered a crime and did not designate an eyewitness to be a resident of the same area. However, their enmity with the accused was not so serious as to suggest that the accused should be substituted for the real culprit, which would otherwise have been a rare occurrence. The ocular version was consistent and encouraging The contradictions in the statements of the prosecution's witnesses were not serious in nature as minor contradictions crept in with the passage. By the time medical evidence supported ocular testimony, the alleged abduction of the accused for about nine months was also a factor that could not be neglected. The accused had committed four brutal murders in a reckless manner and there was no question of any kind in his favor. After conducting a proper analysis of the evidence and the conclusions drawn thereafter, the unclean verdict was passed because they were difficult to understand and hardly any intervention was requested, but accordingly the Supreme Court appealed to the accused. Refused to leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
