Articles 302 and 304 of the Contempt of Evidence Order 1984 (10 of 1984), convictions of fine evidence of 17 cases qualifying witnesses, as evidence, were equated to quantum tales. And in the absence of a conviction offense under Section 304 (1) (a), the PPC facilitates the law of evidence Contains Article 17. The evidence used against each of the 1984 defendants, especially those related to Hoodood and the perpetrator, must be the testimony of witnesses whose integrity, integrity and integrity must be exceeded by the Board. The court thus charges an indispensable duty to satisfy itself. About the Testimony One of the witnesses, who once testified about the testimony, expressed the virtues of testifying in the process of the purification of Al-Shudh, no evidence was recorded before the expiry of six Islamic months. In order to indicate that witnesses were subjected to the purification of tzakia al-shahad during a six-month period before giving evidence in this case, the defendants were sentenced to death as punishment. Was not guaranteed. The High Court did not uphold the law in the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
