Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MUHAMMAD NISAR

The plaintiffs in Section 42 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, alleged that the defendant obtained the power of attorney registered with his uneducated and malicious mother by unlawful and fraudulent means, and said that the power of attorney was for the plaintiff's rights to his son. I gifted their mother's land. The change was affirmed and prayed that the power of attorney in favor of his son and the editing of the gift be declared invalid and the invalid suit was simultaneously rejected by the courts, which caused the plaintiff's mother's own son. Included. A word was uttered either in the prayers or in the defendant's witness statement as to why the plaintiff's mother had gifted her land to the plaintiff's son, especially when the defendant did not request any love or affection from him. Nor did she request the service of the woman be presented that there was no evidence to show the relationship of the woman's w ith her children were pressed down in both courts, in these cases, Acting without legal authority to reject the claim filed by the plaintiffs, the facts filed by the courts below the mother of the material were discovered Oops, that the claimant's mother, who was appointed as a lawyer for the complainant and gave them gifts. The land allotted to his son was not sufficient to sustain the dismissal of the suit and the following court orders were set aside by the High Court under the exercise of its amended jurisdiction. family advocate from Balakot lawyer