Find a Lawyer

MEHRAB KHAN versus THE STATE

Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997 Definition of Proofs 9 (c) Evidence of prosecution on all material details was consistent, reliable and convincing The accused did not specifically dispute the recovery of marijuana from the vehicles he operated. Rather, it was through them that Chars was secretly placed in a specially designed insurance for the delivery of a particular person, and the accused, who was the driver / transporter of the vehicle, could not be ignored. That they were aware of the prohibited thing and after the prosecution established a case for possession and transportation of the offending material, Matt was burdened with offering a legally acceptable explanation, but his position was not permanent and he changed his application at his convenience. About the Chars was not required to be recorded even as transportation, sent atch and delivery o f it was also a crime under the law that it was charged for a particularly long journey. The charge of the kept vehicle should be amputated with the necessary information about its contents, which was sufficient for the accused to control the vehicle carrying a large number of drugs. The defense taken by the transport suspect was not punishable and the conviction was upheld. law firms from Feroz Watan lawyer