NAZAR MUHAMMAD BARRICH versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Demarcation of constituencies The provincial government issued a notification under which a large number of voters were transferred from one constituency to another. And, on election day 6, 2001, the process was initiated through the invitation for nomination papers, the authorities said that adjustments to the rolls were taking place until 21 6 2001. The applicants believed that the notification was against the law because the electoral rolls. No edits can be made. Such an adjustment in the electoral rolls was not permissible under the law to be made after the constituency's demand for election justification, though the government was concerned that the process would be completed across the country by a certain date but the government would have to Cannot allow. Doing so at the expense of violating the law, and in doing so, it should not have acted as abusive and baseless. ue payment of the complications and consequent consequences arising out of the abuse of its powers and misuse of the law without realizing haste, reported by the Provincial Government on 2 6 2001, By the provincial government, which was issued without legal authority and had no legal effect, and the election could not take place on the basis of effective elections, the High Court directed the authorities to do so either in accordance with the district union councils Stabilize the electoral rolls and list the public for inspection three days before the due date for receipt of the nomination. Make available , Or alternatively, easier for respondents to find another way to hold elections
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Toru lawyer