MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus THE STATE
Section 2302 / Cri 34 Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), Section 367 Decisions, Jurisdiction Which Must Be Considered in a Decision The Principal's Trial Court did not examine all the evidence brought on record. There was no reason for this. In order to reach this conclusion and convict the offender, there must have been reasons to support the conviction and a formal request should be made about the mind of the court and not the murder, without any doubt, of the whole evidence. Should be examined. But in the appeal the accused had the right to criticize the verdict because in each case the provisions of section 367, CCPC were mandatory, regardless of its nature, the impeachment verdict was set aside and the case re-written. Was sent to the trial court. Judgment on the existing evidence in light of the provisions of section 367, CR PC, after hearing by both parties in accordance with the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Shahpur Chakar lawyer
