Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SARWAR versus SINDH BAR COUNCIL, KARACHI

Section 26, 31 and 32 of the Civil Practices Rules (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R4 (3) (a) of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973, (a) registration of an advocate appeal approved by the Provincial Bar Council Appellant as Enrollment was A lawyer joined the police department, after nearly 8 years of practice, but after he was dismissed from the job, appellant was dismissed on some charges, but the Enforcement Committee observed the petition to the bar council. Returned with On the basis of which the Appellant was terminated from employment / fell with the expression of morally compromised time, the Council endorsed the decision of the Enrollment Committee and rejected the request to resume the process. The advocate appellant was on trial at the police department and his services were not formalized. , Was not inquired before exiting the service. Cannot be excluded from service dismissal or allegations of removal from service on the basis of which the police were discharged by the department, did not fall within the scope of appreciation of moral turpitude but Were ordinary and had no special charge of bribery, dishonesty or confession of any morals. Appellant's case was mostly ineligible which was strictly constituted \ morally \ the appeal filed by the appellant was allowed and the relevant bar council was directed to restore the applicant's license so that Could follow the law. online advocate from Sajawal lawyer