Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS versus MALIK MUHAMMAD IJAZ

Appeal of the suit relief application for the specific performance of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0 1, R10 and Section 115 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 52 les pendens. An application was made by the applicants to act as a partner in the matter that they are the landlord of the suit from any of the defendants as the application for the transfer was contested on the issue that Lane The principle of religion was influenced by transactions. At the time of the trial, the enforcement of them as parties was dismissed solely on the basis that they were not endorsed by any evidence of sale so that they could be sued as the plaintiff's party. In response, the transaction did not rule out the sale of the suit land in favor of the applicants but only the principles of Les Pendenas against the applicants were exempt and the trial court filed a response filed by the plaintiff Risso. Refused. n by which the applicant's application for application was weighed in court with the trial, especially when a shopkeeper, pending litigation, claimed that he had applied the applicants to the case. Plaintiff who has some interest in the suit land. , Hearings on matters related to the implementation of the parties and the transaction pending by the trial court, and in this case the principle of lais pendens will be reviewed by the trial court. famous supreme court advocate from Sita Road lawyer