Find a Lawyer

ABDUL BASIT ZAHID versus MODARABA AL TIJARAH

Banking Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Issues) Act 1997 SS12 and 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Law Reform Ordinance (X11 of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court Bank Loan Setting Failure to file an appeal under section 21 (Loan Advance, Credit and Finance Recovery) Act 1997, apart from the application of the decree under section 12 (2) of the recovery appeal, the affected appellants were parties. And the witnesses filed their written statement neither through the investigating applicants nor did they rebut any evidence. The respondent's case was blunt and contentious because it was based on documentary evidence which was not seriously disputed by the appellant, but was decided by the banking court. Appeals were targeted by the appellant's application under Section 12 (2), CPC, and such application was dismissed by the banking court. Instead of filing an appeal under section 12 (2) of the Intra Court of Appeal with the Banking Court, instead of filing an appeal under Section 21 (Loans, Progress, Credit Finance Finance) Act 1997 of banking companies, at the appropriate time. , The appellants preferred the applications under Section 12 of the Companies (Loans, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Finance) Act 1997 and Section 12 (2) of the CPC High Court and refused to interfere with the judgment and order. ? Appeals granted by the banking court intra-court were dismissed in the circumstances online advocate from Toru lawyer