Find a Lawyer

MEHAR DIL KHAN WAZIR versus IBRAHIM KHAN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 247 (7) The Constitutional Applicant was allegedly recovered from the Respondent by the Assistant Political Agent with the Applicant snatched from the Respondent, but his detention was not granted to the Applicant, The petitioner filed a constitutional petition, which was objected to, under Article 247 (7), the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), claiming that the issue of factual dispute cannot be settled in a constitutional jurisdiction and that That the High Court has no jurisdiction because the matter is related to the tribal area. , The sale was contracted in the settled area and was being played as a taxi in the settled area The records showed that Commissioner Bannu was brought to North Waziristan Agency by the request of the District Lucky Marwat complainant, in this regard all Was disclosed and the same story is the real estate sale transaction, the purchase and sale of stamp papers for the contract are all related to the district Lakki Marwat which did not consider the factors of the political authority case. Was able to intervene through the High Court in these situations, especially when political officials Had closed her eyes. Avoid action against hardened criminals and criminals, but they encourage, protect, and help the criminal elements, rather than crush and stop them. Accepting the constitutional request, the Political Agent was instructed to return the car from the applicant immediately upon submission. If its offer security bond applicant can file a criminal complaint against private respondents, if desired top advocates from Kazi Ahmed lawyer