ISMAIL KHAN versus THE STATE
After a preliminary inquiry by the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b), the definition of evidence was filed in the FIR but the case was not established. The prosecution's case was based on any eye, medical and circumstantial evidence. Was not supported and no blank was recovered from the incident site. Delays of two hours and 25 minutes in filing an FIR were found on the exterior wall of the complainant's home but were not specified, although the police station was a short distance away and the complainant had statements. Were available. The complainant and the investigating officer encountered many contradictions. The complainant, who was the sole witness in this case, was either not present or did not tell the truth, based on the same evidence relied upon by the trial court. The acquittal of the co-accused and the culprit alone was not a strong basis for maintaining his conviction. The accused was acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer