ABDUL MAJEED versus THE STATE
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), the testimony of Section 450 evidence was the natural witness of the incident to the father and the mother of the minor girl who is a prisoner at home. According to the FIR story, the ocular testimony was supported by the recovery of medical evidence and the blood stained with the victim's child; no material contradictions and contradictions were identified in the prosecutor's evidence, defense witnesses testified. Was not supported, the complainant designated the accused immediately my relationship with the witnesses filed with the witnesses in the absence of any evidence on record regarding their enmity with the defendant's request for defense There was no room for evidence to be disposed of simply because a person could sue. The honor and reputation of his minor daughter and the culprits were punished g was laid aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Daharki lawyer
