FAZAL HUSSAIN versus MST. ASMAT BIBI
The constitutional application suit for dissolving the marriage on the basis of Section 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, was decided on the condition that the husband pay the money and gold jewelery to the appellate court on appeal. Yes, removed from the decree Although the husband in his written statement alleged to the trial court in connection with the payment of money and jewelry that the wife had left the house with jewelry and cash, but did not make any special demands. Are there some benefits to it? The Plaintiff, and that he should return to the consideration for the suit for the same, not to make any demand on behalf of the Defendant either in his petitions or from the evidence of payment of money and jewelry. In this case, the Family Court was not obliged to order its payment. The said Appellate Court correctly set the trial court's order, terminating the payment of money and jewelry.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Nilam lawyer